Securing the Future of 🇮🇳’s Internet Economy (2/2)

Reading Time: 6 minutes

For full context, you may want to read the first part of this article 👉 ‘The Sale-&-Leaseback of India’s Digital Future’, )

2007: The Digital ‘Battle of Plassey’ which Google Won.

This is 👇 ! India’s search engine started by 2 engineers in 2006.

Before Google and Facebook began yielding insane nuclear, monopolist market power, there was a generation of startups (Sequia funded Guruji, Sabeer Hotmail Bhatia funded ApnaCircle and a dozen others) that tried to build search engines, maps, and social media for India. Those days, risk capital was scarce, India’s venture capital partnerships were itself ‘starting-up’.

Guruji, was a search engine built on a proprietary technology “that crawled the web identifying Indian content using sophisticated algorithms”. David vs Goliath style, Guruji fought a valiant battle with the infinitely more resourceful Goliath, Google.

Guruji lost & Google won, India.

The Prophecies of Marc and Mark!

During the ensuing commotion of the global financial crisis and resultant parched venture capital funding, Google-Facebook firmly planted their pirate 🏴‍☠️ flags atop their ‘search and social’ empires in India and other emerging markets. In the past decade, all Silicon Valley consumer technology giants have landed in India, built massive digital monopolies across vertical social media, mobile operating systems, and instant messaging and most recently invading, nation’s economy critical, real-time-fast payment methods like ‘our’ UPI.

In 2016, coinciding with a decade of Facebook in India, this is what Marc Andressen, Board Member, Facebook said:

“Anti-colonialism has been economically catastrophic for the Indian people, Why stop now”. – Marc Andressen

Mark responded to Marc’s tweet with, “India is personally important to me and Facebook..”

Relax, take a few minutes to think what then, and continuing Facebook’s board member, Marc Andressen’s, freudian slip-of-the-tongue means for India.

The present, here is what digital colonialism looks like

Actually, Marc Andressen and Mark Zukerberg, both forecasted correctly since India is very important, they and their ilk, have digitally colonized India.

Indians use these everyday, monopoly digital products because they have to (monopoly effect, Zero consumer choice), & not necessarily, because they want to (competition is ‘always’ better for consumers, more choice and resultant value).

These companies are the new age opium houses, deploying armies of product and design managers to embed dark manipulative psychological designs (colours, fonts, dark patterns) in their products to maximize usage, both in frequency and recency. This leads to a higher return-on-ad-spend for advertisers and resultant more ads, ultimately more profits fot platforms which drive up their market capitalisations. The profits get ploughed in their digital internet colonies in emerging markets.

If the features don’t work, the promotional cash backs will. Google has burnt truckloads of cash, investing in I̶n̶d̶i̶a̶ ̶f̶u̶t̶u̶r̶e̶, in-its-Payments future via GooglePay, now commands an outrageous 50%+ market-share of UPI, and WhatsAppPay desperately waiting for a regulatory green light to join the UPI race. India’s Bhim app now holds a less than 2 % share. ‘Local’ UPI, ‘Local data & ‘they’ get to monetize it.

Mitron vs Facebook Reels

Facebook has now rolled out Reels, the TikTok feature clone on Instagram to fill the vacuum left by a banned TikTok. Perfectly legitimate, but their enormous social media platform distribution leverage leaves the brilliantly designed, heavily localized homegrown social media video apps by young Indians, some still in college dorms, as Indian comic Kunal Kamra says, “Inka (college students) ka canteen main udhari hai, yeh kya…” at a severe disadvantage.

Let Chingari, Mitron, and others not meet’s fate.

Remember, Facebook won’t ever list in India. When Reels was announced, it shares jumped on the NASDAQ. Apple will soon hit a $2 Trillion market cap. Not a cent of value will be created in India.

& the below retweet innocently confirms how India, inadvertently gets swooned by foreign tech giants.

Securing 🇮🇳 Digital’s Future:

Guruji did not have adequate resources or an ‘enabling ecosystem of laws, for instance ‘application of anti-trust law regulation to digital monopolies’ which could have ensured a level playing field’ to fight with Google.

Google and Facebook are not invincible. Google is a search company, it cannot do social media, video calling or instant messaging. Likeways, Facebook is yet to prove its mettle beyond their core competence of social media. However both yield enormous distribution, possess financial and engineering resources aiding them to build products adjacent to their core competency, which they artfully copy, quickly build and relentlessly scale. They need to be tamed, their garb of “Investing in India’s future” need to be pulled off.

Indian consumer startups are building great products. Flipkart built the e-commerce core competencies – technology, logistics, assortment, analytics, user experience at par with giant Amazon. Likewise, we have category leaders like Swiggy, Zomato, Paytm, Ola, OYO, Dream11, and, my personal favorite, the insanely efficient, orgasmic product experience of Cleartrip. I am a Cleartripper 😆.

India’s enterprise tech companies like Zoho, MuSigma, BillDesk are gods and need no introduction.

Redesigning 🇮🇳’s digital future

Europe, Russia, and Latin American nations are working to secure their digital sovereignty, China already controls its digital sovereignty.

If India could design and secure it’s digital tomorrow – how we would do it?

Here is a 5-point actionable plan for MEITY.

1. Build laws for local-digital-economic-value capture & harvest:

Foreign internet technology companies entering India, must:

  • Build their local India entity (RBI has a similar law for Foreign banks, should they wish to operate freely like local banks, else they can run stymied operations)

  • Book all local revenue, locally (no financial shenanigans, nor regulatory arbitrage)

  • List their India entity, locally within X years of operations

2. Build laws for data sovereignty

Foreign internet technology companies must data localize,

3. Build “digital” anti-trust laws

4. Implement laws, & offer poetic justice 🎼

Foreign internet technology companies violating any of the laws, whether data localization or local economic value capture, must be penalized in a sequence:

  • Severe public warning (Russia style)

  • Concomitant fine (European style & sized, €1.49 billion )

  • & then section 69a, recently leveraged to ban 🇨🇳 apps in 🇮🇳’s national interest.

5. Encourage, robust independent public policy think tanks for ‘action-oriented research and dialogue’ to secure India’s future.

Thankfully, India 🇮🇳 has decisive political leadership, which, once it understands the implications and extent of the digital colonisation, can immediately secure India’s digital future.

I’d love your feedback, questions, and comments!

Source link

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the FinMedium or its members. The presentation of material therein does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the FinMedium concerning the legal status of any company, country, area, or territory or of its authorities. For more info. please read our ToU & Privacy Policy here. If you have any concerns regarding this post, please reach out to our grievance officer Ghanisht Nagpal and drop a mail to

Every Wednesday and Saturday, we send Info-Graphic and FinMedium Weekly Digest newsletters to our 25000+ Subscribers.

Join Them Now!

Vibhu Arya

Vibhu Arya

Vibhu has previously worked in India, Middle East, South East Asia, and China across banking, e-commerce, fintech, varied payment types, remittances, and blockchain.
Please Share Now :)